In “Dog Food Logic” and “Only Have Eyes for You“, I have emphasized (okay, some might say “harped upon”) the need for pet food companies to provide digestibility information to consumers. It is not a difficult value to determine and most pet food companies already conduct feeding trials that measure this (yet keep the results to themselves). As one of the most basic measures of food quality, digestibility provides essential information that can help dog owners to select the best food for their dog.
What is digestibility (and why does it matter)? To refresh, digestibility reflects a food’s ability to deliver essential nutrients to the dog who is eating it. This ultimately affects not only defecation quantity and quality (how much your dog poops and how the poop looks and smells), and a dog’s propensity for flatulence (no explanation needed), but more importantly, a dog’s longterm health and wellness. This graphic, presented in the essay, “Scoopin’ for Science“, summarizes how digestibility is measured using feeding trials with dogs.
In case you have not noticed, it is that last step, “Provide Results to Consumers” that is glaringly absent from the dog food scene. But, I harp (again).
Onward. There is good news to tell.
Good vs. Poor Digestibility: The term digestibility coefficient refers to the percent of a food that the dog absorbs into his or her body during the process of digestion. As a rule of thumb, dry dog foods with digestibility values of 75 % or less will be of very poor quality, those with values between 75 and 82 % are classified as moderate in quality, and foods with digestibility values that are higher than 82 % are of high quality. If you see products with 88 % or more reported digestibility, you have a rock star. (For a more detailed explanation of dog food digestibility, see “Dog Food Logic”).
The paradox lies in the fact that while many pet food companies routinely measure the digestibility of their products, they are not required to report this information to the people who buy their foods. Most do not provide this information even when it is directly requested. Digestibility matters (a lot), but we cannot judge foods with information that we do not have.
The good news is that two research studies measuring the digestibility of dog foods formulated with different types of protein sources were recently published by a group of animal nutritionists from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences and the University of Copenhagen in Denmark (1,2). The first compared the digestibility of dog foods that used three common animal protein meals and the second compared the use of fresh chicken meat (aka “chicken first”) with poultry meal as protein sources in a dry food. Because all of the protein ingredients that the researchers examined are frequently found in commercial foods, their results may be helpful to you in your search for a quality food.
Like me, you may be surprised by what they found:
Lamb, fish, or poultry meal? In the first study, the investigators compared the protein and overall digestibility of three dry (extruded) dog foods that were formulated containing equivalent amounts of either lamb meal, fish meal or poultry meal (1). Because one of the objectives of their work was to determine if mink provide a suitable model for assessing pet food quality, they tested the foods in growing mink, adult mink and adult dogs.
Results: As a protein source, lamb meal showed significantly lower values for multiple measures of protein quality and essential amino acid content when compared with both poultry meal and fish meal. Even though all three diets were formulated to provide complete and balanced nutrition, the lamb meal diet was found to be deficient in the essential amino acid methionine, when digestibility was taken into account. Although differences between poultry and fish meals were not as dramatic, poultry meal was of lower quality than fish meal. As a protein source in dog food, fish meal had the highest values on almost all quality measures, including digestibility and essential amino acid content. When tested in adult dogs, the protein digestibility values of the three foods were 71.5, 80.2, and 87.0 for lamb meal, poultry meal and fish meal, respectively. Overall, this study suggests that, at least for the sources used in this work, the order of protein quality was lamb meal (poor), poultry meal (moderate), and fish meal (high). Additionally, although the reported level of lamb meal in the diet exceeded the minimum methionine requirement for adult dogs, the actual amount of methionine that was available to the dogs (i.e. was digested) was less than their minimum requirement for this nutrient.
Is fresh chicken better? The team’s second study is groundbreaking. It is the first to examine whether or not there is a demonstrated benefit to including “fresh” (frozen, actually) chicken in an extruded, dry dog food. This is important because the promotion of “fresh first” on pet food labels is frequently used as a claim for higher protein quality in the product. The researchers tested the digestibility and amino acid content of fresh, raw chicken (technically referred to as “raw mechanically separated chicken meat”) before processing (cooking) and then again after it was included in a dry dog food to replace about 25 percent of the product’s poultry meal. Because raw meat has been shown to be more digestible than dry rendered protein meals, it was hypothesized that including raw chicken in the dry food would indeed improve the foods digestibility by several percentage points. (Note: Because mink had been previously shown to be a suitable model for dogs, adult mink were used to test the diets).
Results: As expected, when tested before processing the digestibility of raw chicken meat was significantly higher than that of rendered poultry meal (88.2 % vs. 80.9 %, respectively). However, when the raw chicken meat replaced 25 percent of the poultry meal in an extruded dry food, the digestibility of the food was not significantly improved (81.3 vs. 80.3, respectively). In addition, the digestibility of several essential amino acids was actually higher in the food containing only poultry meal than in the food that included the raw chicken meat.
Take Away for Dog Folks
Wow. The results of these two studies contradict several previously accepted (if never actually proven) dog food edicts. These are:
- Lamb meal is a high quality protein source for pet foods. Um, apparently not. The first study found that lamb meal was poorly digested (70.5 %) and provided inadequate levels of an essential amino acid, methionine after digestibility was taken into account.
- Named species meals are always superior to generic meals. This refers to the general rule of thumb that dog folks should always choose a food that uses chicken, turkey, salmon or lamb meals over the less specific meat, poultry or fish meals. At least regarding the animal-based protein sources used in these studies, choosing lamb over the generic poultry or fish may not get you the quality you are hoping for.
- Chicken first on the pet food label means higher quality (more digestible) protein: Nope again. While the digestibility of fresh chicken meat was higher than that of poultry meal when tested prior to processing, incorporating fresh chicken (as 25 percent of the protein source!) into an extruded food did not improve digestibility or lead to a higher quality product. The researchers speculated that this may have occurred because raw meat ingredients could be more susceptible to damage caused by the heating and drying processes of extrusion than are rendered protein meals. Regardless of the cause, it appears that “Chicken First’ may not be the marketing holy grail that pet food companies are promoting it to be.
This is great information for dog folks to have. Many thanks to this team of researchers, among others (all notably at universities, not from pet food companies) who have been publishing scientific evidence regarding the protein quality, amino acid content, digestibility and safety of various dog food ingredients and products. We are grateful to you all and hope to see more of these types of studies. Although these do not (yet) go so far as to provide us answers to the most important question: “What is the digestibility of the brand of food that I am feeding to my dog?” they provide needed and essential information.
I have said this many times before and will say it again:
If pet food manufacturers insist on telling us that their brands of food are expected to provide “complete and balanced nutrition” throughout our dogs’ lives, then providing a few very simple measures of the quality of those foods is not too much to ask.
The researchers of these papers agree. They finish the abstract of their first paper with this statement: “Furthermore, the study showed that to ensure nutritional adequacy of dog food and to be able to compare protein quality of dog foods, information of AA [amino acid] composition and digestibility is crucial“. [Emphasis mine].
So, pet food manufacturers……..are you listening? Time to step up and provide this information on your labels, websites, or at the very least, in response to direct inquiries. In the meantime, I will continue to report and promote research studies that provide us with the information that we need to choose smart for our dogs.
Until next time, happy feeding and happy training!
- Tjernsbekk MT, Tauson AH, Matthiesen Cf, Ahlostrom O. Protein and amino acid bioavailability of extruded dog food with protein meals of different quality using growing mink (Neovison vison) as a model. Journal of Animal Science 2016; 94:3796-3804.
- Tjernsbekk MT, TAuson AH, Kraugerus OF, Ahlstrom O. Raw, mechanically separated chicken meat and salmon protein hydrolysate as protein sources in extruded dog food: Effect on protein and amino acid digestibility. Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 2017 (in press).
New Science Dog Book!
“Feeding Smart with The Science Dog” by Linda P Case
Description: In The Science Dog’s latest myth-busting book, Linda Case takes on canine nutrition and feeding practices. It seems that almost everyone has an opinion about how our dogs should be fed and what diet is healthiest for them. In this timely book, Linda Case takes a look at the evidence and what answers science can provide regarding how to best feed our dogs. The book’s five sections each tackle a set of commonly posed questions, using the research of leading nutritionists to provide practical answers. If you wonder whether dogs are true carnivores, whether or not they can digest grains, why some dogs gain weight so easily, and if it is safe to feed your dog a raw diet, this book has the answers for you. Other chapters separate nutrition fact from fiction regarding omega-3 fatty acids, dietary supplements, the quality of pet food ingredients, and nutrient needs and dietary preferences of dogs. Whether you are a canine health professional, trainer, work with a shelter or rescue group, own a dog-related business or simply wish to understand nutrition and feeding better, the information provided in “Feeding Smart” will be of interest and value to you.
24 thoughts on “Digestibility Matters”
Pingback: A New Scoop for Citizen Scientists | The Science Dog
Pingback: It’s Here, It’s Here! | The Science Dog
Pingback: Farting French Bulldogs – The Science Dog
Pingback: More Human-Grade Research… and a Rant – The Science Dog
Pingback: Your Dog’s Microbiome – What You Should Know – The Science Dog
Pingback: New Scoop (and Poop) on Human-Grade Dog Food – The Science Dog
Pingback: The Raw Deal – The Science Dog
Pingback: 5 Best Dog Foods For Bullmastiffs 2019 - Pup Junkies
Pingback: 5 Best Dog Foods For Cane Corso 2019 - Pup Junkies
Pingback: Mind Your Peas and Potatoes – The Science Dog
Pingback: Digestibility Matters | Pet Guardian Angels of America
Can you recommend any studies on mink/dog’s digestibility of raw fresh chicken vs cooked fresh chicken?
Very interesting. It matches my anecdotal observation that my dog doesn’t do as well on lamb based kibble than chicken or fish based ones (she is currently on fish based kibble).
Thanks for sharing this. For me, the most salient point is actually that the raw meat was more digestible (raw feeder here if you hadn’t guessed). I remember seeing the results of a study years ago that showed raw chicken was more digestible than cooked chicken, which was more digestible than that in processed, dry kibble, but I’ve never been able to locate it again so nice seeing that supported here to a degree.
I didn’t realize that companies already measured digestibility and agree wholeheartedly that it’s information the companies should provide, at least upon request. Is there an organization overseeing dog foods that could be petitioned to have the companies provide it?
Very interesting – would it be too much of an extrapolation to say that a fresh chicken diet is therefore around 10% more digestible than a chicken kibble diet, if all the other nutrients are accounted for? And that quite possibly the same goes for other protein sources?
Hi Frances, The data presented were for protein digestibility, rather than for the entire diet (dry matter digestibility). So, it would be correct to say that, for the sources used in these studies, the protein provided by fresh (raw) chicken meat was about 10 percent higher in digestibility than was the protein provided by poultry meal. Best wishes, Linda
Pingback: Digestibility Matters | Modern dog training met...
Pingback: Digestibility Matters – PetMoving.org
I have found that one of my dogs really doesn’t do well on fresh chicken. I’ve not tried the meal but I wouldn’t anyway now. I have known of other dogs with serious digestion problems with chicken.
Neither do I give my dogs fresh lamb. They seem to have trouble digesting the fat and their dropping afterwards smell like rancid fat.
I’ve not had any problems with beef, but it is way too expensive here to feed to dogs. We ourselves are eating much less beef than we used to.
What about beef? Why only fish, lamb and chicken in the studies?
I don’t know. Maybe because beef is not as common an ingredient as chicken and poultry meal and fish meal. They also did not study turkey or bison or pork or five-toed dingle beast in these particular experiments. Contact the researchers and ask them if you are concerned about their omission. Yeesh. Linda Case
I do tend to feed Kangaroo meat mostly. Being “country” we can buy it in bulk which makes it affordable. WE used to be able to get an excellent ‘all kangaroo’ dried dog food but it was bought out by Uncle Ben’s and the kangaroo became a trace so they could still carry the old label. 😦
When we lived in the Kimberlies we fed either beef legs (whole, from a Cattle Station) or donkey from the shooters of feral donkeys. Both dogs we had then did very well on these — probably best on the whole beef legs which they got with hair and hoof attached.
The best we can do here closer to civilisation is raw (unsalted) pigs trotters.
I think it’s *very* important to know who FUNDED the studies and what their desired outcome was.
The studies were not funded by a pet food company, if that is what you are asking. (And, if you read the results, you would see that the results are not in line with current pet food marketing schemes). Linda Case